Horror story


In April 2015 I issued a letter of offer for a project (Project A). I was informed that I was too expensive and they would pursue bank finance. In May 2015 one of my repeat borrowers discussed with me a very similar project in the same street (Project B).

GPS funded Project B without a presales requirement. It is now nearly complete. All units have been sold. The borrower will shortly bank a tidy profit from a successful project. We are moving on with the next project for this developer.

Applications for finance for Project A have passed over my desk many times in the last year from a number of brokers. It is still a vacant site, and therefore has no holding income. The project is now unviable as the cost of construction has increased by about $60,000 per unit. The deal has also been well and truly “shopped”, which financiers consider to be a credit risk. Due to the current restrictions on construction finance it is currently a buyers’ market for developer sites. The options for the developers of Project A would appear to be to sell the site to mitigate losses or pump in a substantial amount of equity for little return.

The developers of Project A have lamented to me their decision to pursue bank finance. They noted that presales requirements continued to grow, marketers did not perform and LVRs decreased.

Certainty has a value.

Recent updates

View all updates

What is “subordination”?

Olivia and Jess, from our Investor Services team, have recently received...

New loans are coming

GPS continues to regain traction in our loan pipeline, but it...